Larsen Howie All articles
Governance & Ownership

Permission to Trade: The Board Register for Licences, Registrations and Memberships

Larsen Howie
Permission to Trade: The Board Register for Licences, Registrations and Memberships

Photo: Scottish Government, CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons

A lapsed permission rarely announces itself. It is usually discovered at the worst possible moment: during a site inspection, after an insurer asks for evidence, when a customer checks a supplier file, or when a professional membership is needed to sign off work. By then the practical damage is already done. Trading may have to stop, a tender may be withdrawn, or a claim may be questioned because a required registration was not in place.

For UK directors, the answer is not a folder of certificates or a calendar reminder held by one administrator. It is a board-level register that records what the business is permitted to do, who owns each permission, when it must be renewed, and where the evidence sits. The register does not need to be elaborate. It does need to be accurate, reviewed and visible to the people who make decisions.

Why this belongs on the board agenda

Permissions are operating assets. They allow a premises to open, a waste load to be moved, personal data to be processed, a regulated activity to be carried out, or a professional opinion to be given. When one lapses, the commercial consequence can be immediate and disproportionate to the cost of renewal.

The governance point is simple. A director should be able to answer three questions without asking someone else: which permissions does the company rely on, which are closest to expiry, and what would happen if each one stopped being valid? If those answers are not available, the board is carrying an unmeasured operational risk.

What belongs in the register

The scope should reflect the business, not a generic checklist. A useful starting point is to group permissions by the activity they support.

This is not an exhaustive legal list. It is a practical prompt. The test is whether the permission is required by law, by a contract, by an insurer, or by a customer or tender process. If the answer is yes to any of those, it belongs in the register.

The fields that make it useful

A register that records only a name and a renewal date will not prevent a lapse. Each entry should carry enough information for someone other than the original administrator to act.

Include the permission or registration, the issuing body, the activity it supports, the consequence if it lapses, the named owner, the expiry or review date, the lead time needed to renew, the evidence location, the cost, and any dependencies. Dependencies matter. A premises licence may depend on planning use, a professional membership may depend on continuing education, and a waste registration may depend on the correct legal entity being named.

The lead-time field is often the most valuable. Some renewals are immediate; others require inspections, references, training records or updated policies. A register that shows only the expiry date encourages late action. A register that shows the date by which the renewal process must start encourages control.

Owners, evidence and escalation

Every entry should have a named owner. A department is not an owner. The owner is the person who confirms that the permission is still required, starts the renewal, obtains the evidence and escalates any risk of lapse.

The evidence should be stored where it can be retrieved quickly and without relying on an individual mailbox. For each permission, the register should point to the certificate, approval, registration confirmation or membership record. Where the evidence is held by a third party, such as a landlord, insurer or professional body, the register should say so and record how it can be obtained.

Escalation should be routine rather than heroic. A sensible pattern is a monthly exception report showing permissions due within the next 90 days, any renewal not yet started, and any owner who has not confirmed status. The board does not need to review every certificate, but it should see exceptions and decisions.

Designing the routine

A register is only useful if it is maintained. The routine should include a quarterly review at board level, a monthly check by owners, and a trigger review whenever the business changes. New premises, new activities, new directors, acquisitions, changes of legal entity and new customer contracts can all change the permission set.

It is also worth linking the register to insurance renewals and tender preparations. Insurers and customers often ask the same questions that the register is designed to answer. A single source of evidence reduces duplication and improves consistency.

When a renewal is at risk

Sometimes the register will show that a renewal cannot be completed before expiry. That is a decision for directors, not an administrative inconvenience. The board should record whether the affected activity will pause, whether interim controls are sufficient, whether customers or insurers need to be notified, and who is accountable for the decision. A short written record is better than an assumption that someone has handled it.

A practical first pass

A useful first exercise takes less than an hour. List the ten permissions the business would least like to lose. For each one, name the owner, locate the evidence, confirm the expiry date and note the lead time. Mark any gaps honestly. That list becomes the first draft of the register and the first board discussion.

The licence that lapses on a Tuesday is rarely a surprise by the time it happens. It is usually the result of a permission that was never properly owned, evidenced or reviewed. A director-level register turns that quiet risk into a managed one.

All Articles

Related Articles

Custody Is Not Ownership: Building a Board-Level Register of Digital Assets

Custody Is Not Ownership: Building a Board-Level Register of Digital Assets

The Policy Behind the Certificate: An Annual Insurance Review for UK Directors

The Policy Behind the Certificate: An Annual Insurance Review for UK Directors

Decisions That Stand Up: A Practical Record for Board and Shareholder Approvals

Decisions That Stand Up: A Practical Record for Board and Shareholder Approvals